A Comparison of Chitosan and Collagen Sponges as Hemostatic Dressings

Author:

Wang Xiaohong1,Yan Yongnian2,Zhang Renji2

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing by Materials Processing Technology and Center of Organ Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China, Institute of Life Science and Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China,

2. Key Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing by Materials Processing Technology and Center of Organ Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China, Institute of Life Science and Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China

Abstract

The hemostatic capability, adhesion ability and biocompatibility of chitosan sponges were compared with commercial collagen sponges. The chitosan sponges were briefly immersed in an aqueous 20% ammonia solution before being applied to a rabbit cervical vein wound. The total amount of bleeding from the injured veins until hemostasis was similar for both chitosan and collagen sponges. The complete hemostasis success rates for both the chitosan and collagen sponges were also similar. Under hemostasis, the chitosan sponges strongly adhered to the surface of the rabbit muscles, whereas the collagen sponges were easily detached from the muscles. Under wet conditions, however, there was no significant difference in the adhesive ability between the two sponges. During implantation, the chitosan sponges were much more flexible and resistant to breakage than the collagen sponges. The biocompatibilities and biodegradation rates of the two sponges were totally different after subcutaneous implantation in rabbits. The chitosan sponge was degraded much slower than the collagen sponge, while tissue responses for the chitosan sponges were much greater than for the collagen sponges.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,Biomaterials,Bioengineering

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3