Affiliation:
1. Leidos Inc, Virginia, USA
2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA
3. Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, USA
Abstract
Objective This field study examined the effects of adaptive cruise control (ACC) on mind wandering prevalence. Background ACC relieves the driver of the need to regulate vehicle speed and following distance, which may result in safety benefits. However, if ACC reduces the amount of attentional resources drivers must devote to driving, then drivers who use ACC may experience increased periods of mind wandering, which could reduce safety. Methods Participants drove a prescribed route on a public road twice, once using ACC and once driving manually. Mind wandering rates were assessed throughout the drive using auditory probes, which occurred at random intervals and required the participant to indicate whether or not they were mind wandering. Measures of physiological arousal and driving performance were also recorded. Results No evidence of increased mind wandering was found when drivers used ACC. In fact, female drivers reported reduced rates of mind wandering when driving with ACC relative to manual driving. Driving with ACC also tended to be associated with increased physiological arousal and improved driving behavior. Conclusion Use of ACC did not encourage increased mind wandering or negatively affect driving performance. In fact, the results indicate that ACC may have positive effects on driver safety among drivers who have limited experience with the technology. Application Driver characteristics, such as level of experience with in-vehicle technology and gender, should be considered when investigating driver engagement during ACC use. Field research on vehicle automation may provide valuable insights over and above studies conducted in driving simulators.
Funder
Federal Highway Administration
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference46 articles.
1. Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review
2. Detecting and Quantifying Mind Wandering during Simulated Driving
3. Balk S. A., Jackson S., Philips B. H. (2017). Cooperative adaptive cruise control human factors study: Experiment 4—preferred following distance and performance in an emergency event (Report No. FHWA-HRT-17-024). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献