The Effects of Extended Practice on the Evaluation of Visual Display Codes

Author:

Christ Richard E.1,Corso Gregory M.2

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Army TRADOC Systems Analysis Activity, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

2. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

A series of nine experiments are reported in which highly practiced subjects were used to investigate the use of letters, digits, familiar geometric shapes, and colored dots as coding dimensions in visual displays. These experiments used single-code and dual-code displays in three isolated tasks (choice reaction, search and locate, and identification-memory) and in a multiple task that combined the three tasks in an irregularly alternating sequence. The results of these experiments provided no basis for concluding that any particular code has a general advantage or disadvantage over any other. Furthermore, when there were differences in performance with different codes, there was a tendency for practice to attenuate those differences. It is concluded that the relative effectiveness of different visual codes varies as a function of practice, other display conditions, the tasks, and the dependent measure used to make the comparison.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Lisbon Symbol Database (LSD): Subjective norms for 600 symbols;Behavior Research Methods;2015-08-15

2. Input/Output Devices and Interaction Techniques;Computing Handbook, Third Edition;2014-05-08

3. Colour graphics and task complexity in multivariate decision making;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal;2002-10-01

4. The Effects of Visual Information on Users' Mental Models: An Evaluation of Pathfinder Analysis as a Measure of Icon Usability;International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics;2001-03

5. Overview;Interpreting Remote Sensing Imagery;2001-02-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3