Interactions in Sociotechnical Systems: Achieving Balance in the Use of an Augmented Reality Mobile Application

Author:

Wooldridge Abigail R.1ORCID,Morgan John2,Ramadhani Widya A.1ORCID,Hanson Keith3ORCID,Vazquez-Melendez Elsa3,Kendhari Harleena3,Shaikh Nadia3,Riech Teresa3ORCID,Mischler Matthew3ORCID,Krzyzaniak Sara4ORCID,Barton Ginger5,Formella Kyle T.67,Abbott Zachary R.8,Farmer John N.67,Ebert-Allen Rebecca67,Croland Trina356

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

2. Grainger, Lake Forest, IL, USA

3. University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, IL, USA

4. Stanford Medicine, CA, USA

5. OSF HealthCare Children’s Hospital of Illinois, Peoria, IL, USA

6. Jump Simulation, Peoria, IL, USA

7. OSF HealthCare, Peoria, IL, USA

8. InContext Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Objective We explore relationships between barriers and facilitators experienced by users to understand dynamic interactions in sociotechnical systems and improve a mobile phone-based augmented reality application that teaches users about the contents of a standardized pediatric code cart. Background Understanding interactions between performance obstacles and facilitators can provide guidance to (re)designing sociotechnical systems to improve system outcomes. Clinicians should know about contents and organization of code carts, and an augmented reality mobile application may improve that knowledge but changes the sociotechnical system in which they learn. Prior work identified barriers and facilitators impacting the use of this application—participants described dimensions together, indicating interactions that are explored in the current study. Method We conducted four focus groups (number of clinicians = 18) and two interviews with clinicians who used the application. We performed a secondary analysis of focus group data exploring interactions between previously identified barriers and facilitators to application use. We used epistemic network analysis to visualize these interactions. Results Work system barriers interacted with barriers and facilitators interacted with facilitators to amplify cumulative negative or positive impact, respectively. Facilitators balanced barriers, mitigating negative impact. Facilitators also exacerbated barriers, worsening negative impact. Conclusion Barriers and facilitators interact and can amplify, balance, and exacerbate each other—notably, positives are not always positive. To obtain desired outcomes, interactions must be further considered in sociotechnical system design, for example, the potential improvements to the application we identified.

Funder

Jump Applied Research for Community Health through applied research in Engineering and Simulation (ARCHES) endowment through the Health Care Engineering Systems Center

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3