Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
Abstract
The silhouette of a jet aircraft that is used as an airport symbol on highway route markers was evaluated to determine the strength of its directional information when used with an arrow route marker and when used alone. Signs with the plane silhouette plus the route arrow were combined as described in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices; that is, no agreement between plane orientation and route direction was required. This produced signs with concordance, discordance, and orthogonal relationships between the plane orientation and the route direction. In addition, signs with the plane silhouette only (without a route arrow) were tested. Without prior instruction, the majority of the observers did not interpret the airport symbol as providing directional information without a route arrow. However, after instructions, the mean response time for signs of plane silhouettes alone (752 ms) was comparable to response times (765 ms) for signs with concordance between plane-silhouette orientation and route-arrow direction. Response times to signs with orthogonal and discordant relations between plane and arrow direction were significantly slower (834 ms and 865 ms, respectively).
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Congruent visual information improves traffic signage;Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour;2012-07
2. Prompting correct lifting posture using signs;Applied Ergonomics;1999-08
3. Assessment of Push/Pull Door Signs: A Laboratory and Field Study;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;1994-12
4. Functions;Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications;1994-01