Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Public Health Outreach Campaigns

Author:

Schneider Tamera R.1,Feufel Markus A.2,Berkel Hans J.3

Affiliation:

1. Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

2. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany

3. Cancer Prevention Institute, Dayton, Ohio

Abstract

Objective: Research on public outreach campaigns is presented. Background: One study examines the effects of instruction design on adherence to cancer self-screening instructions. A second study examines the effect of persuasive announcements on increasing screening campaign participation. Method: The first study examined adherence to screening (operationalized as returning results for evaluation) given standard instructions, or one of three other versions: persuasive, human factored, or a combination of the two. The second study investigated combining persuasion with a campaign announcement to increase participation (operationalized as picking up a test kit). Results: The first study found that among first-time participants, the persuasive and human-factored instructions evoked higher result return rates than did the standard. The second study found that participation was significantly increased by adding persuasion to the campaign announcement. Conclusion: Enhancing motivation and reducing cognitive barriers increase adherence to test instructions and increase participation. Application: These are simple, cost-effective strategies that increase adherence to cancer screening in public outreach campaigns, which may reduce cancer-specific mortality.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Heuristics for designing user‐centric drug products: Lessons learned from Human Factors and Ergonomics;British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology;2020-01-23

2. Nudging in screening: Literature review and ethical guidance;Patient Education and Counseling;2018-09

3. How to Uncover Sources of Unwarranted Practice Variation: A Case Study in Emergency Medicine;Qualitative Health Research;2018-05-21

4. Health Care Design;Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications;2017-01

5. Rational versus unreasonable persuasion in doctor–patient communication: A normative account;Patient Education and Counseling;2013-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3