Tests of Ten Control-Display Linkages

Author:

Chapanis Alphonse1,Mankin Donald A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

This experiment tested ten different linkages between four displays and four control buttons on a verticallymounted surface. The displays were arranged in a square and the controls were in a vertical column to the right of the displays. A single panel was used for all tests; different linkages were made by changing electrical connections. Eighty male subjects (eight for each linkage) were tested. The subject's task was to push the appropriate control button as soon as a light appeared in one of the displays. Each subject was given 96 consecutive trials on the linkage to which he was assigned. Dependent measures were: times to first response, times to correct response, and errors. The results show that one of the ten linkages is best in terms of both time and errors. There are also some significant differences between certain other linkages. These findings hold only for those situations in which, for some reason, it is necessary to have the displays arranged in the form of a square and the controls in a vertical column to the right of the displays.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Another test of sensor lines on control panels;Ergonomics;2001-11

2. A Human Factors Data-Base to Influence Safety and Reliability;Human Factors and Decision Making: Their Influence on Safety and Reliability;1988

3. The Effects of Panel Arrangement and Locus of Attention on Performance;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;1987-10

4. Using Sensor Lines to Show Control-Display Linkages on a Four Burner Stove;Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting;1987-09

5. Control-Display Relationships on the Four-Burner Range: Population Stereotypes versus Standards;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;1978-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3