Proximity Compatibility and Information Display: Effects of Color, Space, and Objectness on Information Integration

Author:

Wickens Christopher D.1,Andre Anthony D.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois, Savoy, Illinois

Abstract

We report two experiments in which different features of the display of multiple channels of information are varied in their proximity to one another. The display presents three indicators of aircraft stall danger (airspeed, flaps, and bank). On some trials the stall danger is estimated, requiring information integration. On other trials the value of individual indicators is estimated, requiring focused attention. In Experiment 1 the spatial proximity between indicators and their distinctiveness in color were manipulated. Spatial proximity had little effect on either focused attention or integration, whereas a distinct color code improved focused attention and disrupted integration. In Experiment 2 the three indicators were presented as a bar graph or were combined as features of an object display, either with or without color coding of the separate dimension. Relative to the bar graph display, the object display improved information integration but disrupted focused attention. The presence of color borders restored the focused attention accuracy, with a slight cost to response time.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference32 articles.

1. Andre, A. D., and Wickens, C. D. (1988). The interaction of spatial and color proximity in aircraft stability information displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1371–1375). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

2. Beringer, D. B., and Chrisman, S. E. (1987). A comparison of shape/object displays, quasi-shape displays, and conventional univariate indicators: Integration benefits or the “nearer to thee” effect? In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 543–547). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Cited by 163 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3