Comparing Resident, Proxy, and Staff Respondents for Nursing Home Residents’ Preferences for Everyday Living

Author:

Kunicki Zachary J.1ORCID,Madrigal Caroline23ORCID,Quach Lien T.245,Riester Melissa R.1,Jiang Lan2,Duprey Matthew S.3,Bozzay Melanie12,Zullo Andrew R.23,Singh Mriganka26,McGeary John1,Wu Wen-Chih26,Rudolph James L.25

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

2. VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA

3. Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA

4. Department of Gerontology, The University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA

5. Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA

Abstract

To encourage person-centered care, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid require nursing homes to measure resident preferences using the Preferences Assessment Tool (PAT). No known research has examined the implications of respondent type (i.e., resident, proxy, staff) on preference importance; therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the importance of preferences depending on which respondent completed the PAT. Participants included 16,111 Veterans discharged to community-based skilled nursing facilities after hospitalization for heart failure. A majority (95%) of residents completed the PAT compared to proxy (3%) and staff (2%). Proxy responders were both more and less likely to indicate individual preferences as important compared to residents. Staff members were consistently less likely to indicate all preferences as important compared to residents. Findings from this study emphasize the need for proxy and staff to find methods to better understand residents’ preferences when residents are not able to participate in assessments.

Funder

Health Services Research and Development

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3