Content Analysis and Predicting Survey Refusal: What Are Respondents’ Concerns about Participating in a Face-to-face Household Mental Health Survey?

Author:

Hyder Sanaa123,Bilal Lisa123,Mneimneh Zeina4,Naseem Mohammad Talal123,DeVol Edward2,Aradati Maggie123,Shahab Mona1567,BinMuammar Abdulrahman123,Al-Subaie Abdullah38,Al-Habeeb AbdulHameed9,Altwaijri Yasmin123

Affiliation:

1. King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2. Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

3. SABIC Psychological Health Research & Applications Chair (SPHRAC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

4. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

6. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Clinical Psychology Department, Leiden University, the Netherlands

7. i-psy interculturele psychiatrie, Parnassia Groep, The Netherlands

8. Edrak Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

9. Mental Health and Social Services, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that refusals form the largest proportion of nonresponse for household surveys. As face-to-face household health surveys are uncommon in several countries, it might be advantageous for prospective surveys to preemptively tackle respondents’ refusal to survey participation. Using contact history data from the Saudi National Mental Health Survey, we examined the relationship between social environmental factors, respondent characteristics, survey request concerns recorded by interviewers, and respondents’ propensity to refuse to participate in the survey. Content analysis and logistic regressions were conducted. Our findings suggest that urbanicity, region, socioeconomic status, age, and gender are associated with refusal. Patriarchal gatekeepers and specific survey-related concerns are more likely to lead to temporary refusals compared to final refusals. These results have implications for survey researchers employing similar recruitment and data collection methods, for example in tailoring refusal conversion strategies for interviewers to address concerns expressed by Saudi and/or culturally similar respondents.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anthropology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3