Clinical Reasoning, Grünbaum, and Freud’s “Cleverest Dreamer” Dream Interpretation
-
Published:2019-04
Issue:2
Volume:67
Page:229-248
-
ISSN:0003-0651
-
Container-title:Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Am Psychoanal Assoc
Author:
Michael Michael T.
Abstract
The philosopher Adolf Grünbaum has repeatedly criticized Freud’s reasoning, claiming that much of it is overtly fallacious. One such criticism that has gone without reply concerns Freud’s controversial response to the counterwish objection to his theory of dreams, that the reason some dreams appear to represent the frustration of a wish rather than the fulfillment of one is that they actually represent the dreamer’s wish to prove Freud wrong. Grünbaum contends that in giving such a response Freud commits several glaring fallacies. But Grünbaum’s analysis is mistaken and misrepresents Freud’s thought. Contrary to Grünbaum’s interpretation of Freud’s reasoning as deductive, this reasoning is best construed as a form of “inference to the best explanation.”
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Subject
Clinical Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Psychoanalytic proof: Revisiting Freud’s Tally Argument;The International Journal of Psychoanalysis;2023-03-04