Biomechanical Evaluation of Extramedullary Versus Intramedullary Reduction in Unstable Femoral Trochanteric Fractures

Author:

Kawamura Tadashi1ORCID,Minehara Hiroaki1,Tazawa Ryo1,Matsuura Terumasa1,Sakai Rina2,Takaso Masashi1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan

2. Department of Medical Engineering and Technology, Kitasato University, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Abstract

Introduction: The failure rate of operations involving the cephalomedullary nail technique for unstable femoral trochanteric fractures is 3-12%. Changing the reduction strategy may improve the stability. This study aimed to confirm whether reducing the proximal fragment with the medial calcar contact, as opposed to utilizing an intramedullary reduction, would improve the stability of such fractures. Materials and Methods: The unstable femoral trochanteric fracture model was created with fixation by cephalomedullary nails in 22 imitation bones. The 2 reduction patterns were as follows: one was with the proximal head-neck fragment external to the distal bone in the frontal plane and anterior in the sagittal plane as “Extramedullary,” while the other was the opposite reduction position, that is, bone in the frontal plane and sagittal plane as “Intramedullary.” We evaluated the tip-apex distance, compression stiffness, change in femoral neck-shaft angle, amount of blade telescoping, and diameter of the distal screw hole after the compression test. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: No significant differences were seen in compression stiffness ( p = 0.804) and femoral neck-shaft angle change ( p = 0.644). Although the “Extramedullary” tip-apex distance was larger than the “Intramedullary” distance ( p = 0.001), it indicated clinically acceptable lengths. The amount of blade telescoping and the distal screw hole diameter were significantly larger in “Intramedullary” than in “Extramedullary” ( p < 0.001, p = 0.019, respectively). Our results showed that “Intramedullary” had significantly larger blade telescoping and distal screw hole diameters than “Extramedullary,” and contrary to our hypothesis, no significant differences were seen in compression stiffness and femoral neck-shaft angle change. Conclusions: As opposed to the “Intramedullary” reduction pattern, the biomechanical properties of the “Extramedullary” reduction pattern improved stability during testing and decreased sliding.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3