Abstract
In this look at the disciplinary history of industrial relations and labor history, the author focuses on the long period of disassociation between the two fields and the growing contact between them in the 1980s. He suggests that industrial relations scholars became more receptive to historical modes of thought when events such as the decline in union membership (starting in the mid-1970s) and the sharp recession of 1981–82 proved that industrial relations could not be treated like a static system, describable by invariant laws of labor economics. Similarly, he argues, labor historians, who were able to concentrate on writing “history from the bottom up” during the era of mature collective bargaining, have recently shown a revived interest in the study of institutions, politics, and power.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference42 articles.
1. Brett Jeanne M., 1980. “Mediation and Organizational Development: Models for Conflict Management.” Proceedings. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 195–202.
2. The old labor history and the new: In search of an American working class
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. US Labor Institutionalism’s Rise and Decline and the Death of US Industrial Relations;Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal;2021-11-09
2. Labor Archaeology;Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology;2020
3. Introduction;The Stratifying Trade Union;2017-10-18
4. Remembering an Industrial Landscape;International Journal of Historical Archaeology;2006-03
5. Labor’s Heritage: Remembering the American Industrial Landscape;Historical Archaeology;2004-12