Getting a diagnosis v. learning to live with it? The case of the progressive ataxias

Author:

Daker-White Gavin1,Sanders Caroline2,Greenfield Julie3,Ealing John4,Payne Katherine5

Affiliation:

1. Health Sciences - Methodology Research Group, School of Community Based Medicine, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK,

2. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, UK

3. Ataxia UK, Lincoln House, Kennington Park, London, UK

4. Department of Neurology, Hope Hospital, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK

5. Health Sciences - Methodology Research Group, School of Community Based Medicine, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the perceptions and experiences of the diagnosis process in people with a progressive ataxia, a group of rare complex neurological conditions usually leading to disturbances in balance and speech. Methods: An explorative qualitative study involving analysis of public accounts posted to specialist Internet discussion forums by people with symptoms of ataxia. Internet data were utilized partly because ataxia is a rare condition. Results: The main themes that emerged were diagnosis as an arduous process, achieving diagnosis as a privilege, the importance of getting a medical label, being believed with regard to symptoms and ‘idiopathic’ diagnosis as a non-diagnosis. The accounts of people who were not able to secure a definitive diagnosis suggested that their priorities had changed from getting a diagnosis to managing and learning to live with their progressive disabilities. Conclusions: The diagnosis of the progressive ataxias presents challenges for patients, clinicians and in terms of the extensive use of finite healthcare resources. Our findings suggest there are varied views on the importance of diagnosis to people with progressive ataxia. This warrants further in-depth research to understand how people rate the relative utility of diagnostics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3