Affiliation:
1. Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials,
2. Biostatistics, and
3. Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dentistry 309, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract
A systematic review was performed on studies investigating the effects of implant surface roughness on bone response and implant fixation. We searched the literature using MEDLINE from 1953 to 2003. Inclusion criteria were: (1) abstracts of animal studies investigating implant surface roughness and bone healing; (2) observations of three-month bone healing, surface topography measurements, and biomechanical tests; (3) provision of data on surface roughness, bone-to-implant contact, and biomechanical test values. The literature search revealed 5966 abstracts. There were 470, 23, and 14 articles included in the first, second, and third selection steps, respectively. Almost all papers showed an enhanced bone-to-implant contact with increasing surface roughness. Six comparisons were significantly positive for the relationship of bone-to-implant contact and surface roughness. Also, a significant relation was found between push-out strength and surface roughness. Unfortunately, the eventually selected studies were too heterogeneous for inference of data. Nevertheless, the statistical analysis on the available data provided supportive evidence for a positive relationship between bone-to-implant contact and surface roughness.
Reference28 articles.
1. Albrektsson T (2001). Is surgical skill more important for clinical success than changes in implant hardware? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3:174–175.
2. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004a). Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 17:536–543.
3. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004b). Oral implant surfaces: Part 2—review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 17:544–564.
4. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs
5. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1988). Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:21–24.
Cited by
415 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献