Why do we want the right to die? A systematic review of the international literature on the views of patients, carers and the public on assisted dying

Author:

Hendry Maggie1,Pasterfield Diana1,Lewis Ruth2,Carter Ben2,Hodgson Daniel3,Wilkinson Clare1

Affiliation:

1. North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK

2. North Wales Centre for Primary Care, Bangor University Research, Wrexham, UK

3. Dean of Medicine Office, Cardiff University, UK

Abstract

Background: Assisted dying is legal in four European countries and three American states. Elsewhere, particularly in more affluent or mainly Protestant countries, it remains controversial. Dominant headlines feature professional (medical, legal, religious) arguments versus celebrity campaigners; ordinary people are less clearly represented. Aim: To synthesise the international evidence of people’s views and attitudes towards assisted dying in order to inform current debate about this controversial issue. Design: Systematic review and mixed method synthesis of qualitative and survey data Data sources: Eleven electronic databases from inception to October 2011; bibliographies of included studies Review Methods: Two reviewers independently screened papers and appraised quality. Qualitative results were extracted verbatim; survey results were summarised in a table. Qualitative data were synthesised using framework methods and survey results integrated where they supported, contrasted or added to the themes identified. Results: Sixteen qualitative studies and 94 surveys were included; many participants considered the immediate relevance of assisted dying for them. Themes related to poor quality of life, a good quality of death, potential abuse of assisted dying and the importance of individual stance. People valued autonomy in death as much as in life. Attitudes were diverse, complex and related to definitions of unbearable suffering including physical, psycho-social and existential factors and were consistent regardless of social, economic, legal and health-care contexts. Conclusion: Our review sheds light on ordinary people’s perspectives about assisted dying, when they are ill or disabled. Unbearable suffering is a key construct, and common factors are revealed that lead people to ask for help to die. The consistency of international views indicates a mandate for legislative and medical systems worldwide to listen and understand this.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Market Research Services. Appendix 7: public opinion on the legalisation of euthanasia/PAS: a research review. Select committee on Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill, First report, 2007, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldselect/ldasdy/86/8617.htm

2. Debbie Purdy fails to win protection for her husband to help her die

3. Parents will not be prosecuted over son's suicide

4. BBC News. France rejects right-to-die plea, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7301566.stm (accessed 17 July 2012).

5. CBC News Canada. The fight for the right to die, http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/06/15/f-assisted-suicide.html (accessed 17 July 2012).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3