End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: Results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire

Author:

Hunt Katherine J1,Shlomo Natalie2,Addington-Hall Julia1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

2. Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Background/aim: Health policy places emphasis on enabling patients to die in their place of choice, and increasing the proportion of home deaths. In this article, we seek to explore reported preferences for place of death and experiences of care in a population-based sample of deaths from all causes. Design: Self-completion post-bereavement survey. Setting/Participants: Census of deaths registered in two health districts between October 2009 and April 2010. Views of Informal Carers – Evaluation of Services Short Form was sent to each informant (n = 1422; usually bereaved relative) 6–12 months post-bereavement. Results: Response was 33%. In all, 35.7% of respondents reported that the deceased said where they wanted to die, and 49.3% of these were reported to achieve this. Whilist 73.9% of those who were reported to have a preference cited home as the preferred place, only 13.3% of the sample died at home. Cancer patients were more likely to be reported to achieve preferences than patients with other conditions (p < .01). Being reported to have a record of preferences for place of death increased the likelihood of dying at home (odds ratio = 22.10). When rating care in the last 2 days, respondents were more likely to rate ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ for nursing care (p < .01), relief of pain (p < .01) and other symptoms (p < .01), emotional support (p < .01) and privacy of patient’s environment (p < .01) if their relative died in their preferred place. Conclusions: More work is needed to encourage people to talk about their preferences at the end of life: this should not be restricted to those known to be dying. Increasing knowledge and achievement of preferences for place of death may also improve end-of-life care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Higginson IJ. Local preferences and place of death in regions within England 2010. Report, Cicely Saunders International, London, August 2011.

2. Place of Care in Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Patient Preferences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3