Patients’ preferences in palliative care: A systematic mixed studies review

Author:

Sandsdalen Tuva12,Hov Reidun1,Høye Sevald1,Rystedt Ingrid2,Wilde-Larsson Bodil12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing and Mental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Hedmark University College, Elverum, Norway

2. Discipline of Nursing Science, Department of Health Science, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Abstract

Background: It is necessary to develop palliative care to meet existing and future needs of patients and their families. It is important to include knowledge of patient preferences when developing high-quality palliative care services. Previous reviews have focused on patient preferences with regard to specific components of palliative care. There is a need to review research on patient’s combined preferences for all elements that constitute palliative care. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify preferences for palliative care among patients in the palliative phase of their illness, by synthesizing existing research. Data sources: Studies were retrieved by searching databases – the Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Sociological Abstracts – from 1946 to 2014, and by hand searching references in the studies included. Design: A systematic mixed studies review was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data according to the eligibility criteria. Data were synthesized using integrative thematic analysis. Results: The 13 qualitative and 10 quantitative studies identified included participants with different illnesses in various settings. Four themes emerged representing patient preferences for care. The theme ‘Living a meaningful life’ illustrated what patients strived for. The opportunity to focus on living required the presence of ‘Responsive healthcare personnel’, a ‘Responsive care environment’ and ‘Responsiveness in the organization of palliative care’. Conclusion: The four themes may be useful for guiding clinical practice and measurements of quality, with the overall goal of meeting future needs and improving quality in palliative care services to suit patients’ preferences.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3