Affiliation:
1. Research Unit for General Practice and Department of Family Medicine, Aarhus University, School of Public Health, Denmark
2. The Palliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
3. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Abstract
Background: Meeting patient’s preferences is an important outcome in palliative care. No Scandinavian study has reported systematically collected preferences from patients regarding place of care (POC) and place of death (POD). The extent of possible incongruence between patients’ preferences and reality remains unknown. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe patients’ preferred POC and POD and changes in preferences over time and to evaluate congruence between preferences and reality. Furthermore, the aim was to search for predictive factors regarding patients’ wishes and fulfilment of these. Method: This is a prospective interview and questionnaire study. Setting/participants: The study was conducted in the former Aarhus County, Denmark and 96 end-stage cancer patients participated. Results: Of the patients, who stated a preference, 84% preferred home care and 71% preferred home death. A positive association between living with a partner and both wishing for home care and home death was observed (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07, 2.58), p = 0.02 and PR: 2.33 (95% CI: 1.14, 4.77), p = 0.02, respectively). Marked changes in preferences were observed. Overall, preferences were met for approximately half of the patients, although kappa values were low ( κ=0.132 for POC and κ=0.034 for POD).We found a significant association between being cared for in the preferred place and having contact with a palliative care team (PR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.02, 3.98), p = 0.045). Conclusion: Regular discussions with patients on this subject are needed. Social and professional support is of importance in meeting patients’ preferences. Larger scaled studies and research focusing on meeting patients’ preferences are needed.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. Place of Care in Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Patient Preferences
2. Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death
3. Davies E, Higginson IJ. Palliative care: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, http://www.euro.who.int/document/E82931.pdf (2004, accessed 9 October 2010).
4. Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2008. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen [The Danish National Register of Causes of Death 2008]. 13th ed. Copenhagen: Danish National Board of Health, 2009 (in Danish). http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2009/DOKU/nye_tal/doedsaarsagsreg_2008.pdf (2009, accessed October 9 2010).
5. Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2005 [Causes of Death in Denmark 2005], http://www.sst.dk/Planlaegning%20og%20kvalitet/Smertelindring/Tal_fakta.aspx (2007, accessed 9 October 2010) (in Danish).
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献