Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients

Author:

Brogaard Trine1,Neergaard Mette A2,Sokolowski Ineta1,Olesen Frede1,Jensen Anders B3

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit for General Practice and Department of Family Medicine, Aarhus University, School of Public Health, Denmark

2. The Palliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

3. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Abstract

Background: Meeting patient’s preferences is an important outcome in palliative care. No Scandinavian study has reported systematically collected preferences from patients regarding place of care (POC) and place of death (POD). The extent of possible incongruence between patients’ preferences and reality remains unknown. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe patients’ preferred POC and POD and changes in preferences over time and to evaluate congruence between preferences and reality. Furthermore, the aim was to search for predictive factors regarding patients’ wishes and fulfilment of these. Method: This is a prospective interview and questionnaire study. Setting/participants: The study was conducted in the former Aarhus County, Denmark and 96 end-stage cancer patients participated. Results: Of the patients, who stated a preference, 84% preferred home care and 71% preferred home death. A positive association between living with a partner and both wishing for home care and home death was observed (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07, 2.58), p = 0.02 and PR: 2.33 (95% CI: 1.14, 4.77), p = 0.02, respectively). Marked changes in preferences were observed. Overall, preferences were met for approximately half of the patients, although kappa values were low ( κ=0.132 for POC and κ=0.034 for POD).We found a significant association between being cared for in the preferred place and having contact with a palliative care team (PR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.02, 3.98), p = 0.045). Conclusion: Regular discussions with patients on this subject are needed. Social and professional support is of importance in meeting patients’ preferences. Larger scaled studies and research focusing on meeting patients’ preferences are needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Place of Care in Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Patient Preferences

2. Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death

3. Davies E, Higginson IJ. Palliative care: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, http://www.euro.who.int/document/E82931.pdf (2004, accessed 9 October 2010).

4. Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2008. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen [The Danish National Register of Causes of Death 2008]. 13th ed. Copenhagen: Danish National Board of Health, 2009 (in Danish). http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2009/DOKU/nye_tal/doedsaarsagsreg_2008.pdf (2009, accessed October 9 2010).

5. Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2005 [Causes of Death in Denmark 2005], http://www.sst.dk/Planlaegning%20og%20kvalitet/Smertelindring/Tal_fakta.aspx (2007, accessed 9 October 2010) (in Danish).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3