Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice

Author:

Chan Adrienne YL123,Ge Mengqin1,Harrop Emily45,Johnson Margaret6,Oulton Kate7,Skene Simon S8ORCID,Wong Ian CK12910,Jamieson Liz910ORCID,Howard Richard F7ORCID,Liossi Christina711ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong

2. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H), Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, Hong Kong

3. Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

4. Helen & Douglas House, Oxford, UK

5. John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

6. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

7. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

8. Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK

9. Research Department of Pratice & Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK

10. Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, University College London School of Pharmacy and University College London Hospital, London, UK

11. School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Abstract

Background: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. Aim: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. Design: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. Data sources: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. Results: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. Conclusion: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups.

Funder

national institute for health research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference81 articles.

1. Estimating the Global Need for Palliative Care for Children: A Cross-sectional Analysis

2. Fraser LK, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, et al. ‘Make Every Child Count’ estimating current and future prevalence of children and young people with life-limiting conditions in the United Kingdom. https://www.togetherforshortlives.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Prevalence-reportFinal_28_04_2020.pdf (2020, accessed December 19 2020).

3. Paediatric palliative care: development and pilot study of a ‘Directory’ of life-limiting conditions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3