Are patients’ preferences for information and participation in medical decision-making being met? Interview study with lung cancer patients

Author:

Pardon Koen1,Deschepper Reginald1,Vander Stichele Robert2,Bernheim Jan1,Mortier Freddy3,Schallier Denis4,Germonpré Paul5,Galdermans Daniella6,Van Kerckhoven Willem7,Deliens Luc8

Affiliation:

1. End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

2. Heymans Institute for Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

3. Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

4. Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

5. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

6. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, ZNA Middelheim Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium

7. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hospital Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium

8. on behalf of the EOLIC consortium; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

We examined the degree to which newly diagnosed patients with advanced lung cancer wanted to be informed and involved in medical decision-making, and whether the patients felt their preferences were met. Patients from 13 hospitals in Flanders were interviewed with a standard questionnaire. A total of 128 patients (68%) participated. Of the patients who wanted to be informed about life expectancy, half (53%) reported they were informed, and of those who wanted to be informed about palliative care and end-of-life decisions, 25% and 31% said they were informed, respectively. With regard to participation in medical decision-making (in general, about treatment, transfer or end-of-life), patients who preferred the doctor to make decisions or those who preferred to make the decision themselves often achieved this (in their perception), while patients who wanted an in-between position with some involvement, often did not. To conclude, preferences of patients with lung cancer for information concerning delicate topics and for shared decision-making with the physician were not well met.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3