Healthcare use and healthcare costs for patients with advanced cancer; the international ACTION cluster-randomised trial on advance care planning

Author:

Korfage Ida J1ORCID,Polinder Suzanne1,Preston Nancy2ORCID,van Delden Johannes JM3,Geraerds Sandra (A)JLM1ORCID,Dunleavy Lesley2ORCID,Faes Kristof4,Miccinesi Guido5,Carreras Giulia5,Moeller Arnfeldt Caroline67,Kars Marijke C3ORCID,Lippi Giuseppe8,Lunder Urska9,Mateus Ceu10ORCID,Pollock Kristian11,Deliens Luc4ORCID,Groenvold Mogens67,van der Heide Agnes1,Rietjens Judith AC1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

3. Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4. End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium

5. Clinical Epidemiology, Oncological network, prevention and research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy

6. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Department of Palliative Medicine, The Research Unit, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Tuscany Region Health Agency, Italy

9. University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia

10. Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

11. School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning supports patients to reflect on and discuss preferences for future treatment and care. Studies of the impact of advance care planning on healthcare use and healthcare costs are scarce. Aim: To determine the impact on healthcare use and costs of an advance care planning intervention across six European countries. Design: Cluster-randomised trial, registered as ISRCTN63110516, of advance care planning conversations supported by certified facilitators. Setting/participants: Patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer from 23 hospitals in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia and the UK. Data on healthcare use were collected from hospital medical files during 12 months after inclusion. Results: Patients with a good performance status were underrepresented in the intervention group ( p< 0.001). Intervention and control patients spent on average 9 versus 8 days in hospital ( p = 0.07) and the average number of X-rays was 1.9 in both groups. Fewer intervention than control patients received systemic cancer treatment; 79% versus 89%, respectively ( p< 0.001). Total average costs of hospital care during 12 months follow-up were €32,700 for intervention versus €40,700 for control patients ( p = 0.04 with bootstrap analyses). Multivariable multilevel models showed that lower average costs of care in the intervention group related to differences between study groups in country, religion and WHO-status. No effect of the intervention on differences in costs between study groups was observed ( p = 0.3). Conclusions: Lower care costs as observed in the intervention group were mainly related to patients’ characteristics. A definite impact of the intervention itself could not be established.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3