Quality improvement priorities for safer out-of-hours palliative care: Lessons from a mixed-methods analysis of a national incident-reporting database

Author:

Williams Huw1ORCID,Donaldson Sir Liam2,Noble Simon3,Hibbert Peter4,Watson Rhiannon1,Kenkre Joyce5,Edwards Adrian1,Carson-Stevens Andrew146

Affiliation:

1. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

3. Marie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

4. Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia

5. University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK

6. Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract

Background: Patients receiving palliative care are often at increased risk of unsafe care with the out-of-hours setting presenting particular challenges. The identification of improved ways of delivering palliative care outside working hours is a priority area for policymakers. Aim: To explore the nature and causes of unsafe care delivered to patients receiving palliative care from primary-care services outside normal working hours. Design: A mixed-methods cross-sectional analysis of patient safety incident reports from the National Reporting and Learning System. We characterised reports, identified by keyword searches, using codes to describe what happened, underlying causes, harm outcome, and severity. Exploratory descriptive and thematic analyses identified factors underpinning unsafe care. Setting/participants: A total of 1072 patient safety incident reports involving patients receiving sub-optimal palliative care via the out-of-hours primary-care services. Results: Incidents included issues with: medications (n = 613); access to timely care (n = 123); information transfer (n = 102), and/or non-medication-related treatment such as pressure ulcer relief or catheter care (n = 102). Almost two-thirds of reports (n = 695) described harm with outcomes such as increased pain, emotional, and psychological distress featuring highly. Commonly identified contributory factors to these incidents were a failure to follow protocol (n = 282), lack of skills/confidence of staff (n = 156), and patients requiring medication delivered via a syringe driver (n = 80). Conclusion: Healthcare systems with primary-care-led models of delivery must examine their practices to determine the prevalence of such safety issues (communication between providers; knowledge of commonly used, and access to, medications and equipment) and utilise improvement methods to achieve improvements in care.

Funder

Marie Curie Cancer Care

Royal College of General Practitioners

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World alliance for patient safety, October 2004, http://www.who.int/patientsafety/worldalliance/en/ (accessed 18 September 2018).

2. World Health Organization. Universal health coverage, 31 December 2017, http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/universal-health-coverage-(uhc) (accessed 25 September 2018).

3. ‘Oh God, not a Palliative’: out-of-hours general practitioners within the domain of palliative care

4. Obstacles to the delivery of primary palliative care as perceived by GPs

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3