Doctors’ and nurses’ views and experience of transferring patients from critical care home to die: A qualitative exploratory study

Author:

Coombs Maureen12,Long-Sutehall Tracy2,Darlington Anne-Sophie2,Richardson Alison2

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Abstract

Background: Dying patients would prefer to die at home, and therefore a goal of end-of-life care is to offer choice regarding where patients die. However, whether it is feasible to offer this option to patients within critical care units and whether teams are willing to consider this option has gained limited exploration internationally. Aim: To examine current experiences of, practices in and views towards transferring patients in critical care settings home to die. Design: Exploratory two-stage qualitative study Setting/participants: Six focus groups were held with doctors and nurses from four intensive care units across two large hospital sites in England, general practitioners and community nurses from one community service in the south of England and members of a Patient and Public Forum. A further 15 nurses and 6 consultants from critical care units across the United Kingdom participated in follow-on telephone interviews. Findings: The practice of transferring critically ill patients home to die is a rare event in the United Kingdom, despite the positive view of health care professionals. Challenges to service provision include patient care needs, uncertain time to death and the view that transfer to community services is a complex, highly time-dependent undertaking. Conclusion: There are evidenced individual and policy drivers promoting high-quality care for all adults approaching the end of life encompassing preferred place of death. While there is evidence of this choice being honoured and delivered for some of the critical care population, it remains debatable whether this will become a conventional practice in end of life in this setting.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Department of Health. Gold standards framework: a programme for community palliative care, http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/ (accessed 21 February 2014).

2. Department of Health. End-of-life care programme progress report summary, http://www.endoflifecare.nhs.uk (2006, accessed 23 October 13).

3. Department of Health. End of life strategy – providing high quality of care for all adults at end of life. London: Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/136431/End_of_life_strategy.pdf (2008, accessed 4 January 2014).

4. Withdrawal of Intensive Care Treatment at Home – ‘a Good Death’

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3