Patients’, family caregivers’, and professionals’ perspectives on quality of palliative care: A qualitative study

Author:

Vedel Isabelle1,Ghadi Véronique2,Lapointe Liette3,Routelous Christelle4,Aegerter Philippe5,Guirimand Frédéric6

Affiliation:

1. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Family Medicine, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

2. Haute Autorité de santé, Paris, France

3. Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

4. Institut du Management, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique, Rennes, France

5. AP-HP, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Département de Santé Publique, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

6. Pôle Recherche, Maison Médicale Jeanne Garnier, Paris, France

Abstract

Background: The quality of palliative care is the foremost preoccupation of clinicians, decision-makers, and managers as well as patients and families. Major input from healthcare professionals is required to develop indicators for the quality of palliative care, but the involvement of patients and families is also recognized as essential, even though this is rarely achieved in practice. Aim: The objectives of this study were to identify (1) convergences and divergences in the points of view of different stakeholders (patients, families, healthcare professionals) relative to key elements of the quality of palliative care and (2) avenues for refining existing indicators of quality of palliative care. Design: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Setting/participants: There were six settings: two hospital-based palliative care units, one hospice, and three other medical units where a mobile palliative care team intervene. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 61 patients, families, healthcare professionals, and managers. Results: Four major dimensions of quality of care are deemed critical by patients, their families, and professionals: comprehensive support for the patients themselves, clinical management, involvement of families, and care for the imminently dying person and death. Differences exist between various stakeholders regarding perceptions of some dimensions of quality of care. Avenues for improving current quality of care indicators are identified. Conclusion: Our study results can be used to refine or develop quality indicators that truly mirror the points of view of patients and their families and of healthcare professionals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, 2009, www.nationalconsensusproject.org

2. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) - measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis

3. Exploring the concept of quality care for the person who is dying

4. Evolution and change in palliative care around the world

5. In their own words: Patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit*

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3