Palliative care triggers in progressive neurodegenerative conditions: An evaluation using a multi-centre retrospective case record review and principal component analysis

Author:

Hussain Jamilla1ORCID,Allgar Victoria2ORCID,Oliver David3

Affiliation:

1. Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK

2. Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

3. Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Abstract

Background: The use of specific triggers has been suggested to help identify patients with progressive neurological disease who would benefit from palliative care. Aim: This study aimed to improve the evidence base for the use of triggers for patients with progressive neurological disease. Design: An evaluation of palliative care services was undertaken using a retrospective case note review of the timing and presence of triggers in the last 2 years of life. Setting/participants: A total of 12 specialist palliative care units across the United Kingdom provided data from 300 patients: mean patient age 70 years, 50% male, diagnoses included motor neurone disease 58%, Parkinson’s disease 17% and Parkinson’s Plus syndromes 12%. Results: There was a high burden of triggers – 17 in the last 2 years of life and 10 in the last 6 months of life. The most frequent triggers were deteriorating physical function, complex symptoms and dysphagia. Four factors were found to explain 64% of the total variance: Factor 1 – Deterioration in physical function, dysphagia, significant complex symptoms and pain; Factor 2 – Weight loss and respiratory symptoms; Factor 3 – Recurrent infections and cognitive decline; Factor 4 – Aspiration pneumonia. Cox regression analyses found different triggers were associated with survival from diagnosis versus survival from referral to palliative care. Different triggers were also associated with survival for different neurological conditions. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is a high burden of triggers in the last months and years of life and that these could potentially be reduced to fewer components. Prospective studies assessing which triggers are useful for different conditions are now required.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference14 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3