Drug management of pain caused by cancer: a study of general practitioners' treatment attitudes and practices

Author:

Lang Chim C,Beardon Paul HG,Ladlow Myles,Macrae William

Abstract

This study assesses the treatment attitudes and practices of general practitioners in the management of pain caused by cancer. The study consisted of two parts: (1) a questionnaire survey of 328 GPs (including trainees) in Tayside, Scotland and (2) an analysis using duplicate prescriptions of all opioid analgesic prescribing over a five-year period among the doctors in a primary health care centre (population 11500). In the questionnaire survey, 63% (206) of the GPs replied. Of these respondents, 80% were prepared to manage malignant pain on their own and 17% would refer 'frequently' to the local hospice. Only 19% of respondents work in collaboration with the pain clinic and, if so, the pain clinic undertakes most of the decisions made on pain management. Co-proxamol (paracetamol plus dextropropoxyphene hydrochloride preparation) was the preferred analgesic for mild to moderate pain due to cancer and controlled-release morphine sulphate was preferred for severe pain. Duplicate prescription monitoring showed that 24% (2722) of patients received one or more prescriptions for opioid analgesics over the study period. Forty-five per cent of the patients were prescribed co-proxamol. When morphine sulphate or diamorphine was prescribed (3% and 1 % of patients respectively), laxatives were frequently coprescribed (64% and 58% respectively), as were anti-emetics (57% and 32% respectively). This study therefore shows that most GPs manage pain caused by cancer without help from hospital specialists. This study also shows a degree of awareness concerning good prescribing practice in cancer pain.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference11 articles.

1. Cancer pain

2. Bonica JJ Importance of the problem. In: Bonica JJ, Ventifridda V eds. Advances in pain research and therapy, Volume 2. New York : Raven Press, 1979: 1-13.

3. Terminal care: evaluation of an advisory domiciliary service at St Christopher's Hospice.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3