Measuring quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people: A scoping review of available tools

Author:

Mayland Catriona R12ORCID,Sunderland Katy A3,Cooper Matthew4ORCID,Taylor Paul56ORCID,Powell Philip A5,Zeigler Lucy7ORCID,Cox Vicki4,Gilman Constance4,Turner Nicola1ORCID,Flemming Kate8ORCID,Fraser Lorna K9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

2. Palliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

3. The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

4. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK

5. School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

6. St Luke’s Hospice, Sheffield, UK

7. Academic Unit of Palliative Care, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

8. Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, York, UK

9. Department of Health Sciences, Martin House Research Centre, University of York, York, UK

Abstract

Background: The circumstances and care provided at the end of a child’s life have a profound impact on family members. Although assessing experiences and outcomes during this time is challenging, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure high quality of care is provided. Aim: To identify available tools which measure the quality of dying, death and end-of-life care for children and young people; describe the content, and data on validity and reliability of existing tools. Design: Scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. Data sources: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for studies published in English (January 2000–June 2021). A review of reference lists and citation searching was also undertaken. Tools needed to include a focus on the ‘dying’ phase of illness (defined as the last month of life). Results: From 2078 articles, a total of 18 studies, reporting on 11 tools were identified. All tools were completed by primary caregivers or healthcare professionals as ‘proxy’ assessments; all except one was undertaken after death. Question items about quality of life and preparation for death were found in all tools; items relating to cultural aspects of care, grief and financial costs were less common. Only 6/11 had undergone psychometric testing within a paediatric palliative care setting. Conclusions: Future research should include ways to adapt, refine and improve existing tools. Assessing their wider application in different clinical and cultural settings and conducting further psychometric assessment represent areas of focus.

Funder

Yorkshire Cancer Research

White Rose Collaborative

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3