Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology

Author:

Grunfeld Eva1,Lethbridge Lynn2,Dewar Ron3,Lawson Beverley4,Paszat Lawrence F5,Johnston Grace6,Burge Frederick4,McIntyre Paul7,Earle Craig C8

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax and Division of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax,

2. Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax

3. Surveillance and Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax

4. Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax

5. Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto

6. Surveillance and Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax and School of Health Services Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax

7. Division of Palliative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax

8. Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston

Abstract

This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3