What happens during early outpatient palliative care consultations for persons with newly diagnosed advanced cancer? A qualitative analysis of provider documentation

Author:

Bagcivan Gulcan12,Dionne-Odom J Nicholas1,Frost Jennifer1,Plunkett Margaret3,Stephens Lisa A4,Bishop Peggy4,Taylor Richard A1,Li Zhongze5,Tucker Rodney6,Bakitas Marie16

Affiliation:

1. UAB School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

2. Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

3. The Center for Nursing Excellence, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

4. Palliative Care, Sentara Martha Jefferson Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, USA

5. Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

6. UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

Abstract

Background: Early outpatient palliative care consultations are recommended by clinical oncology guidelines globally. Despite these recommendations, it is unclear which components should be included in these encounters. Aim: Describe the evaluation and treatment recommendations made in early outpatient palliative care consultations. Design: Outpatient palliative care consultation chart notes were qualitatively coded and frequencies tabulated. Setting/participants: Outpatient palliative care consultations were automatically triggered as part of an early versus delayed randomized controlled trial (November 2010 to April 2013) for patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer living in the rural Northeastern US. Results: In all, 142 patients (early = 70; delayed = 72) had outpatient palliative care consultations. The top areas addressed in these consultations were general evaluations—marital/partner status (81.7%), spirituality/emotional well-being (80.3%), and caregiver/family support (79.6%); symptoms—mood (81.7%), pain (73.9%), and cognitive/mental status (68.3%); general treatment recommendations—counseling (39.4%), maintaining current medications (34.5%), and initiating new medication (23.9%); and symptom-specific treatment recommendations—pain (22.5%), constipation (12.7%), depression (12.0%), advanced directive completion (43.0%), identifying a surrogate (21.8%), and discussing illness trajectory (21.1%). Compared to the early group, providers were more likely to evaluate general pain ( p = 0.035) and hospice awareness ( p = 0.005) and discuss/recommend hospice ( p = 0.002) in delayed group participants. Conclusion: Outpatient palliative care consultations for newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients can address patients’ needs and provide recommendations on issues that might not otherwise be addressed early in the disease course. Future prospective studies should ascertain the value of early outpatient palliative care consultations that are automatically triggered based on diagnosis or documented symptom indicators versus reliance on oncologist referral.

Funder

Foundation for Information for Informed Medical Decision-Making

Cancer and Leukemia Group B Foundation Clinical Scholar Award

National Institute for Nursing Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3