Issues and needs in end-of-life decision making: An international modified Delphi study

Author:

Raijmakers Natasja JH1,van Zuylen Lia2,Costantini Massimo3,Caraceni Augusto4,Clark Jean B5,De Simone Gustavo6,Lundquist Gunilla7,Voltz Raymond8,Ellershaw John E9,van der Heide Agnes10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

3. Regional Palliative Care Network, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy

4. Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

5. Education and Research Unit, Arohanui Hospice, Palmerston North, New Zealand

6. Pallium Latinoamerica NGO, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina

7. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Palliative Home Care Team, County Council of Dalarna, Ludvika, Sweden

8. Department of Palliative Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

9. Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

10. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Background: end-of-life decision making is an important aspect of end-of-life care that can have a significant impact on the process of dying and patients’ comfort in the last days of life. Aim: the aim of our study was to identify issues and considerations in end-of-life decision making, and needs for more evidence among palliative care experts, across countries and professions. Participants: 90 palliative care experts from nine countries participated in a modified Delphi study. Participants were asked to identify important issues and considerations in end-of-life decision making and to rate the need for more evidence. Results: experts mentioned 219 issues in end-of-life decision making related to the medical domain, 122 issues related to the patient wishes and 92 related to relatives’ wishes, regardless of profession or country ( p > 0.05). In accordance, more than 90% of the experts rated the comfort and wishes of the patient and the potential futility of treatment as important considerations in end-of-life decision making, although some variation was present. When asked about issues that are in need of more evidence, 87% mentioned appropriate indications for using sedatives and effects of artificial hydration at the end of life. A total of 83% mentioned adequate communication approaches. Conclusions: palliative care experts from different professions in different countries encounter similar issues in end-of-life decision making. Adequate communication about these issues is universally experienced as a challenge, which might benefit from increased knowledge. This shared experience enables and emphasizes the need for more international research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3