Establishing psychosocial palliative care standards for children and adolescents with cancer and their families: An integrative review

Author:

Weaver Meaghann S12,Heinze Katherine E3,Bell Cynthia J45,Wiener Lori6,Garee Amy M7,Kelly Katherine P8,Casey Robert L9,Watson Anne10,Hinds Pamela S8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC, USA

2. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA

3. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

4. College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

5. Hospice of Michigan Institute, Detroit, MI, USA

6. Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

7. Department of Oncology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

8. Department of Nursing Research and Quality Outcomes, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC, USA

9. Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA

10. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children’s National Health System, Washington DC, USA

Abstract

Background: Despite standardization in disease assessments and curative interventions for childhood cancer, palliative assessments and psychosocial interventions remain diverse and disparate. Aim: Identify current approaches to palliative care in the pediatric oncology setting to inform development of comprehensive psychosocial palliative care standards for pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer and their families. Analyze barriers to implementation and enabling factors. Design: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines framed the search strategy and reporting. Data analysis followed integrative review methodology. Data sources: Four databases were searched in May 2014 with date restrictions from 2000 to 2014: PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Scopus. A total of 182 studies were included for synthesis. Types of studies included randomized and non-randomized trials with or without comparison groups, qualitative research, prior reviews, expert opinion, and consensus report. Results: Integration of patient, parent, and clinician perspectives on end-of-life needs as gathered from primary manuscripts (using NVivo coding for first-order constructs) revealed mutual themes across stakeholders: holding to hope, communicating honestly, striving for relief from symptom burden, and caring for one another. Integration of themes from primary author palliative care outcome reports (second-order constructs) revealed the following shared priorities in cancer settings: care access; cost analysis; social support to include primary caregiver support, sibling care, bereavement outreach; symptom assessment and interventions to include both physical and psychological symptoms; communication approaches to include decision-making; and overall care quality. Conclusion: The study team coordinated landmark psychosocial palliative care papers into an informed conceptual model (third-order construct) for approaching pediatric palliative care and psychosocial support in oncology settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3