Home care by general practitioners for cancer patients in the last 3 months of life: An epidemiological study of quality and associated factors

Author:

Pivodic Lara1,Harding Richard2,Calanzani Natalia23,McCrone Paul4,Hall Sue2,Deliens Luc15,Higginson Irene J2,Gomes Barbara2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine & Chronic Care, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium

2. Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, UK

3. Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

4. Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

Background: Stronger generalist end-of-life care at home for people with cancer is called for but the quality of end-of-life care delivered by general practitioners has been questioned. Aim: To determine the degree of and factors associated with bereaved relatives’ satisfaction with home end-of-life care delivered by general practitioners to cancer patients. Design: Population-based mortality followback survey. Setting/participants: Bereaved relatives of people who died of cancer in London, United Kingdom (identified from death registrations in 2009–2010), were invited to complete a postal questionnaire surveying the deceased’s final 3 months of life. Results: Questionnaires were completed for 596 decedents of whom 548 spent at least 1 day at home in the last 3 months of life. Of the respondents, 55% (95% confidence interval: 51%–59%) reported excellent/very good home care by general practitioners, compared with 78% (95% confidence interval: 74%–82%) for specialist palliative care providers and 68% (95% confidence interval: 64%–73%) for district/community/private nurses. The odds of high satisfaction (excellent/very good) with end-of-life care by general practitioners doubled if general practitioners made three or more compared with one or no home visits in the patient’s last 3 months of life (adjusted odds ratio: 2.54 (95% confidence interval: 1.52–4.24)) and halved if the patient died at hospital rather than at home (adjusted odds ratio: 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.31–0.998)). Conclusion: There is considerable room for improvement in the satisfaction with home care provided by general practitioners to terminally ill cancer patients. Ensuring an adequate offer of home visits by general practitioners may help to achieve this goal.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. Office for National Statistics. Mortality Statistics: deaths registered in England and Wales, 2012, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-325289 (accessed 9 February 2015).

2. Cancer Research UK. Cancer statistics report: cancer mortality in the UK, http://publications.cancerresearchuk.org/downloads/Product/CS_REPORT_MORTALITY.pdf (2014, accessed 9 February 2015).

3. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3