Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review

Author:

Collingridge Moore Danni1ORCID,Payne Sheila1,Van den Block Lieve2,Ling Julie3,Froggatt Katherine1,Gatsolaeva Yuliana,Honinx Elisabeth,Pivodic Lara,Miranda Rose,Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje D.,van Hout Hein,Pasman H. Roeline W.,Oosterveld-Vlug Mariska,Ten Koppel Maud,Piers Ruth,Van Den Noortgate Nele,Engels Yvonne,Vernooij-Dassen Myrra,Hockley Jo,Szczerbińska Katarzyna,Kylänen Marika,Gambassi Giovanni,Pautex Sophie,Bassal Catherine,Deliens Luc,Smets Tinne,Adang Eddy,Andreasen Paula,Barańska Ilona,Finne-Soveri Harriet,Hammar Teija,Heikkilä Rauha,Kijowska Violetta,Leppäaho Suvi,Mammarella Federica,Mercuri Martina,Kuitunen-Kaija Outi,Pac Agnieszka,Morgan de Paula Emilie,Rossi Paola,Segat Ivan,Sowerby Eleanor,van der Steen Jenny T.,Stodolska Agata,Tanghe Marc,Wichmann Anne B.

Affiliation:

1. International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

2. VUB-UGhent End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

3. European Association for Palliative Care, Vilvoorde, Belgium

Abstract

Background: The number of older people dying in long-term care facilities is increasing; however, care at the end of life can be suboptimal. Interventions to improve palliative care delivery within these settings have been shown to be effective in improving care, but little is known about their implementation. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the nature of implementation strategies and to identify facilitators and/or barriers to implementing palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities. Design: Scoping review with a thematic synthesis, following the ENTREQ guidelines. Data sources: Published literature was identified from electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Controlled, non-controlled and qualitative studies and evaluations of interventions to improve palliative care in long-term care facilities were included. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were sourced and data extracted on the study characteristics, the implementation of the intervention, and facilitators and/or barriers to implementation. Results: The review identified 8902 abstracts, from which 61 studies were included in the review. A matrix of implementation was developed with four implementation strategies (facilitation, education/training, internal engagement and external engagement) and three implementation stages (conditions to introduce the intervention, embedding the intervention within day-to-day practice and sustaining ongoing change). Conclusion: Incorporating an implementation strategy into the development and delivery of an intervention is integral in embedding change in practice. The review has shown that the four implementation strategies identified varied considerably across interventions; however, similar facilitators and barriers were encountered across the studies identified. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which different implementation strategies can facilitate the uptake of palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities.

Funder

FP7 Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3