A scoping review of bereavement risk assessment measures: Implications for palliative care

Author:

Sealey Margaret1,Breen Lauren J1,O’Connor Moira1,Aoun Samar M2

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

Abstract

Background: Palliative care standards and policies recommend that bereavement support be provided to family caregivers, yet uncertainty surrounds whether support currently offered by palliative care services throughout developed countries meets caregiver needs. The public health model of bereavement support, which aligns bereavement support needs with intervention, may address this gap between policy and practice. Aim: The aim was to review the literature to identify bereavement risk assessment measures appropriate for different points in the caring and bereavement trajectories, evaluate their psychometric properties and assess feasibility for use in palliative care. Design: A scoping review was systematically undertaken following Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. Data sources: PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases, as well as grey literature including Internet searches of Google, World Health Organization, CareSearch, the Grey Literature Report and OAIster were searched. Bereavement organisations and palliative care websites, reference lists in obtained articles and grief and bereavement handbooks were also scrutinised. Results: Of 3142 records screened, 356 records yielded 70 grief measures. In all, 19 measures published between 1982 and 2014 were identified for inclusion in this review, and categorised for use with family caregivers at three points in time – before the patient’s death ( n = 5), in the period following the death ( n = 10) and for screening of prolonged or complex grief ( n = 4). The majority had acceptable psychometric properties; feasibility for use in palliative care varied substantially. Conclusion: This review is an important preliminary step in improving the assessment of bereavement risk and, consequently, better bereavement outcomes for palliative care family caregivers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference82 articles.

1. Hudson PL, Remedios C, Zordan R, Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 2010, www.centreforpallcare.org

2. Hall C, Hudson PL, Boughey A. Bereavement support standards for specialist palliative care services. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Department of Health, State Government of Victoria (SGoV), Victorian Government, 2012, 31 pp.

3. Palliative Care Australia. Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians. 4th ed. Deakin West, ACT, Australia: Palliative Care Australia, 2005, 40 pp.

4. World Health Organization. Palliative care: what it is, http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/palliative/PalliativeCare/en/print.html (2002, accessed 29 March 2009).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3