Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner–patient communication in palliative care: A systematic review

Author:

Slort W1,Schweitzer BPM1,Blankenstein AH1,Abarshi EA2,Riphagen Il3,Echteld MA2,Aaronson NK4,der Horst HE Van1,Deliens L5

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice, and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands

2. Department of Public and Occupational Health, and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands

3. Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

4. Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands

5. Department of Public and Occupational Health, and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Abstract

While effective general practitioner (GP)–patient communication is required for the provision of good palliative care, barriers and facilitators for this communication are largely unknown. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for GP–patient communication in palliative care. In a systematic review seven computerized databases were searched to find empirical studies on GP–patient communication in palliative care. Fifteen qualitative studies and seven quantitative questionnaire studies were included. The main perceived barriers were GPs’ lack of availability, and patients’ and GPs’ ambivalence to discuss ‘bad prognosis’. Main perceived facilitators were GPs being available, initiating discussion about several end-of-life issues and anticipating various scenarios. Lack of availability and failure to discuss former mistakes appear to be blind spots of GPs. GPs should be more forthcoming to initiate discussions with palliative care patients about prognosis and end-of-life issues. Empirical studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of the perceived barriers and facilitators.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3