Medical indication regarding life-sustaining treatment for children: Focus groups with clinicians

Author:

Lotz Julia Desiree1,Jox Ralf J2,Meurer Christine2,Borasio Gian Domenico3,Führer Monika1

Affiliation:

1. Coordination Center for Pediatric Palliative Care, University Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany

2. Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany

3. Palliative Care Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Background: Decisions about medical indication are a relevant problem in pediatrics. Difficulties arise from the high prognostic uncertainty, the decisional incapacity of many children, the importance of the family, and conflicts with parents. The objectivity of judgments about medical indication has been questioned. Yet, little is known about the factors pediatricians actually include in their decisions. Aim: Our aims were to investigate which factors pediatricians apply in deciding about medical indication, and how they manage conflicts with parents. Design: We performed a qualitative focus group study with experienced pediatricians. The transcripts were subjected to qualitative content analysis. Setting/participants: We conducted three focus groups with pediatricians from different specialties caring for severely ill children/adolescents. They discussed life-sustaining treatment in two case scenarios that varied according to diagnosis, age, and gender. Results: The decisions about medical indication were based on considerations relating to the individual patient, to the family, and to other patients. Individual patient factors included clinical aspects and benefit–burden considerations. Physicians’ individual views and feelings influenced their decision-making. Different factors were applied or weighed differently in the two cases. In case of conflict with parents, physicians preferred solutions aimed at establishing consensus. Conclusion: The pediatricians defined medical indication on a case-by-case basis and were influenced by emotional reasoning. In contrast to prevailing ethico-legal principles, they included the interests of other persons in their decisions. Decision-making strategies should incorporate explicit discussions of social aspects and physicians’ feelings to improve the transparency of the decision-making process and reduce bias.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. A new law on advance directives in Germany

2. Jacobs P, Jox RJ, Weber J, Leitlinie zur Frage der Therapieziel-änderung bei schwerstkranken Patienten und zum Umgang mit Patientenverfügungen, 2013, https://www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/download/de/Fachbereiche/Palliativmedizin/Leitlinie_PV_Langfassung.pdf

3. Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften (SAMW), Schweizer Ärztinnen und Ärzte FMH. Rechtliche Grundlagen im medizinischen Alltag. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis, 2013, http://www.fmh.ch/files/pdf12/Rechtliche_Grundlagen_2013_D.pdf

4. Schweizerische Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften (SAMW). Intensivmedizinische Maßnahmen. Medizin-ethische Richtlinien und Empfehlungen [Intensive-care interventions. Medical-ethical guidelines and recommendations]. Basel: Gremper AG, 2013. file:///C:/Users/Julia/Downloads/e_RL_Intensiv_Juli13_Web.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3