Defining consensus norms for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe, using Delphi methods: A White Paper from the European Association of Palliative Care

Author:

Tuffrey-Wijne Irene1,McLaughlin Dorry2,Curfs Leopold3,Dusart Anne4,Hoenger Catherine5,McEnhill Linda6,Read Sue7,Ryan Karen8,Satgé Daniel9,Straßer Benjamin10,Westergård Britt-Evy11,Oliver David12

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George’s University of London, London, UK

2. Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

3. Governor Kremers Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

4. Centre Régional d’Études, Dijon, France

5. Service de la Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland

6. The Prince & Princess of Wales Hospice, Glasgow, UK

7. Keele University, Keele, UK

8. Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

9. Oncodefi, Montpellier, France

10. Caritas of the Diocese of Munich and Freising, Munich, Germany

11. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Tønsberg, Norway

12. Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities often present with unique challenges that make it more difficult to meet their palliative care needs. Aim: To define consensus norms for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe. Design: Delphi study in four rounds: (1) a taskforce of 12 experts from seven European countries drafted the norms, based on available empirical knowledge and regional/national guidelines; (2) using an online survey, 34 experts from 18 European countries evaluated the draft norms, provided feedback and distributed the survey within their professional networks. Criteria for consensus were clearly defined; (3) modifications and recommendations were made by the taskforce; and (4) the European Association for Palliative Care reviewed and approved the final version. Setting and participants: Taskforce members: identified through international networking strategies. Expert panel: a purposive sample identified through taskforce members’ networks. Results: A total of 80 experts from 15 European countries evaluated 52 items within the following 13 norms: equity of access, communication, recognising the need for palliative care, assessment of total needs, symptom management, end-of-life decision making, involving those who matter, collaboration, support for family/carers, preparing for death, bereavement support, education/training and developing/managing services. None of the items scored less than 86% agreement, making a further round unnecessary. In light of respondents’ comments, several items were modified and one item was deleted. Conclusion: This White Paper presents the first guidance for clinical practice, policy and research related to palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities based on evidence and European consensus, setting a benchmark for changes in policy and practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Pomona. Health indicators for people with intellectual disability: using an indicator set. Pomona II final report, http://www.pomonaproject.org/action1_2004_frep_14_en.pdf (2008, accessed 18 March 2015).

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Better health, better lives: children and young people with intellectual disabilities and their families. In: The case for change, http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/mental-health/publications/2010/better-health,better-lives-children-and-young-people-with-intellectual-disabilities-and-their-families.the-case-for-change (2010, accessed 18 March 2015).

3. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Definition of intellectual disability, http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition#.VGY7FfmsX2N (2013, accessed 18 March 2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3