Is early integration of palliative care feasible and acceptable for advanced respiratory and gastrointestinal cancer patients? A phase 2 mixed-methods study

Author:

Costantini Massimo1,Apolone Giovanni2,Tanzi Silvia3,Falco Francesco4,Rondini Ermanno5,Guberti Monica6,Fanello Silvia5,Cavuto Silvio7,Savoldi Luisa7,Piro Roberto4,Mecugni Daniela8,Di Leo Silvia9

Affiliation:

1. Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

2. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

3. Palliative Care Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

4. Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

5. Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

6. Department of Health Professions, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

7. Department Infrastructure Research and Statistics, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

8. Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

9. Psycho-Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that early integration of palliative care improves quality of life, lowers spending and helps clarify preferences and goals for advanced cancer patients. Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of early integration. Aim: Assessing feasibility of early integration of palliative care, and exploring concerns perceived and problems encountered by patients, relatives and oncologists. Design: A phase 2 mixed-methods study ( ClinicalTrials.Gov :NCT02078700). Methods: Oncologists of two outpatient clinics offered a specialised palliative care intervention integrated with standard oncological care to all consecutive newly diagnosed metastatic respiratory/gastrointestinal cancer patients. We interviewed samples of patients, relatives and oncologists to explore strengths and weaknesses of the intervention. Results: The intervention was proposed to 44/54 eligible patients (81.5%), 40 (90.1%) accepted, 38 (95.0%) attended the first palliative care visit. The intervention was completed for 32 patients (80.0%). It did not start for three (7.5%) and was interrupted for three patients who refused (7.5%). The Palliative Care Unit performed 274 visits in 38 patients (median per patient 4.5), and 24 family meetings with relatives of 16 patients. All patients and most relatives referred to the usefulness of the intervention, specifically for symptoms management, information and support to strategies for coping. Oncologists highlighted their difficulties in informing patients on palliative intervention, sharing information and coordinating patient’s care with the palliative care team. Conclusion: Early integration of palliative care in oncological setting seems feasible and well accepted by patients, relatives and, to a lesser extent, oncologists. Some difficulties emerged concerning patient information and inter-professional communication.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3