Prioritisation of future research topics for children’s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study

Author:

Malcolm C1,Knighting K1,Forbat L1,Kearney N1

Affiliation:

1. University of Stirling, Cancer Care Research Centre, Stirling

Abstract

The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for children’s hospice care. In the qualitative Round 1, interviews with families ( n = 5), linked professionals ( n = 18) and focus groups with hospice staff and volunteers ( n = 44) led to the generation of 56 research topics categorised within 14 broad themes. To give a larger number of stakeholders ( n = 621) (including families n = 293; hospice staff/volunteers n = 216 and professionals n = 112) the opportunity to rate the importance of each research topic and seek group consensus on the future research priorities for children’s hospice care, subsequent Rounds 2 and 3 involved the use of postal questionnaires. Response rates to questionnaires were 44% in Round 2 (274/621) and 83% in Round 3 (204/247). Participants prioritised research topics relating to 1) hospice and respite care needs of young people (aged 16 +), 2) pain and symptom management and 3) bereavement and end-of-life care. There was wide acknowledgement by those took part in the process of the difficulty in rating the topics, and emphasis on the fact that all of the topics raised during the project are of high importance and merit further research. The current salient issues perceived by key stakeholders as being the research priorities for children’s hospice care were identified. Addressing these priority topics for research would further contribute to the development of a much needed evidence base in children’s hospice and palliative care research and optimise the delivery of children’s hospice services that are underpinned by valid and robust research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Paediatric palliative care: a lack of research-based evidence

2. 2 Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and their Families (ACT) and The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). A guide to the development of children’s palliative care services, 2nd ed. Bristol, UK: ACT; 2003.

3. Supporting children with complex health care needs and their families - an overview of the research agenda

4. Paediatric palliative care: challenges and emerging ideas

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3