Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison

Author:

Cartwright Colleen1,Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje D.2,Williams Gail3,Faisst Karin4,Mortier Freddy5,Nilstun Tore6,Norup Michael7,van der Heide Agnes8,Miccinesi Guido9

Affiliation:

1. Aged Services Learning & Research Collaboration, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia,

2. Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Department of Social Medicine and Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Amsterdam

3. School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane

4. University of Zurich, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Zurich

5. University of Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Centre for Environmental Philosophy and Bioethics, Ghent

6. University of Lund, Department of Medical Ethics, Lund

7. University of Copenhagen, Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, Copenhagen

8. Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam

9. Department of Public Health, Rotterdam and Centre for Study and Prevention of Cancer, Epidemiology Unit

Abstract

A major issue in the care of terminally ill patients is communication and information provision. This paper reports the extent to which physicians in Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland discuss topics relevant to end of life care with terminally ill patients and their relatives (without first informing the patient), and possible associations between physician-specific characteristics and such discussions. Response rates to the postal survey ranged from 39% to 68% (n =10139). Physicians in most of the countries except Italy `in principle, always' discuss issues related to terminal illness with their patients but not with patients' relatives without first informing the patient, unless the relatives ask. Cross-national differences remained strong after controlling for physician characteristics. The majority of physicians appeared to support the principle of patient-centred care to terminally ill patients, consistent with palliative care philosophy and with the law and/or professional guidelines in most of the countries studied. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21: 295—303

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3