Choosing the unit of measurement counts: The use of oral morphine equivalents in studies of opioid consumption is a useful addition to defined daily doses

Author:

Svendsen K1,Borchgrevink PC1,Fredheim O2,Hamunen K3,Mellbye A4,Dale O5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pain and Complex Disorders, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Pain and Palliation Research group, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

2. Department of Pain and Complex Disorders, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Pain and Palliation Research group, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Emergency medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway

3. Pain Clinic, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

4. Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Pain and Palliation Research group, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

5. Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Pain and Palliation Research group, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Anaesthesia and Emergency Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

Aim: Defined daily dose (DDD) is the most common measurement unit used in drug consumption studies. The DDD for opioids may not reflect their relative clinical potencies. The aim of this study was to explore whether opioid consumption data may be interpreted differently when adding oral morphine equivalent (OMEQ) dose as a measurement unit compared with using DDD. Methods: The equianalgesic ratio of each opioid relative to morphine was tabulated. Data on opioid consumption expressed in DDD were converted to OMEQs using the equianalgesic ratios. The opioid consumption was compared in three different study settings: clinical data from an opioid switching study, trends within one country and a comparison between countries. Results: Using DDD, the opioid consumption in Norway between 2004–2008 increased of 6.7%, while the increase was 23.6% using OMEQ. While DDD/1000 inhabitants/day showed that Sweden had the highest consumption of opioids among the Nordic countries, OMEQ/1000 inhabitants/day showed that Denmark had the highest consumption. In the switching study DDD indicated a reduction in analgesic dosing and OMEQ an increase when switching from WHO step II to III. Conclusion: OMEQ reflects clinical dosing better than DDD, and can give additional insight into opioid consumption when combined with DDD. Using OMEQ can also lead to different conclusions in opioid consumption studies compared with using DDD alone.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3