What is the methodological rigour of palliative care research in long-term care facilities in Europe? A systematic review

Author:

Albers Gwenda1,Harding Richard2,Pasman H Roeline W1,Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje D1,Hall Sue2,Toscani Franco3,Ribbe Miel W4,Deliens Luc5,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

2. Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, UK

3. Lino Maestroni Foundation Palliative Medicine Research Institute, Italy

4. EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Nursing Home Medicine, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

5. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Abstract

Background: The European population is rapidly ageing, resulting in increasing numbers of older people dying in long-term care facilities. There is an urgent need for palliative care in long-term care facilities. Aim: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on palliative care research in long-term care facilities in Europe with respect to how the palliative care populations were described, and to determine the study designs and patient outcome measures utilized. Methods: We used a systematic literature review. The search strategy included searches of PubMed, Embase and PsychINFO databases from 2000 up to May 2010, using search terms related to ‘palliative care’ and ‘end-of-life care’ combined with search terms related to ‘long-term care’. We selected articles that reported studies on patient outcome data of palliative care populations residing in a long-term care facility in Europe. Results: This review demonstrated that there are few, and mainly descriptive, European studies on palliative care research in long-term care facilities. Fourteen studies were retained in the review, of which eight were conducted in the Netherlands. None of these studies described their study population specifically as a palliative care or end-of-life care population. Retrospective and prospective designs were applied using many different measurement instruments. Most instruments were proxy ratings. Symptom (management) was the most frequently measured outcome. Conclusion: To improve future research on palliative care in long-term care facilities, agreement on what can be considered as palliative care in long-term care facilities and, the availability of well-developed and tested measurement instruments is needed to provide more evidence, and to make future research more comparable.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. Anderson GF, Hussey PS. Health and population aging: A multinational comparison. New york: The Commonwealth Fund; October 1999.

2. Where people die (1974—2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care

3. World Health Organization. ‘Ageing and Life Course, http://www.who.int/ageing/en/ (17 March 2011).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3