‘Sadly I think we are sort of still quite white, middle-class really’ – Inequities in access to bereavement support: Findings from a mixed methods study

Author:

Selman Lucy E1ORCID,Sutton Eileen1,Medeiros Mirra Renata2,Stone Tracey1,Gilbert Emma1,Rolston Yansie3,Murray Karl3,Longo Mirella4,Seddon Kathy5,Penny Alison6,Mayland Catriona R7ORCID,Wakefield Donna8ORCID,Byrne Anthony4ORCID,Harrop Emily4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Palliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK

2. Cardiff School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

3. Ubele Initiative, London, UK

4. Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

5. Wales Cancer Research Centre, Cardiff, UK

6. National Bereavement Alliance, London, UK

7. Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

8. North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK

Abstract

Background: Voluntary and community sector bereavement services are central to bereavement support in the UK. Aim: To determine service providers’ perspectives on access to their support before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design: (1) Cross-sectional online survey of UK bereavement services; (2) Qualitative interviews with staff and volunteers at selected services. Settings/participants: 147 services participated in the survey; 24 interviews were conducted across 14 services. Results: 67.3% of services reported there were groups with unmet needs not accessing their services before the pandemic; most frequently people from minoritised ethnic communities (49%), sexual minority groups (26.5%), deprived areas (24.5%) and men (23.8%). Compared with before the pandemic, 3.4% of services were seeing more people from minoritised ethnic groups, while 6.1% were seeing fewer. 25.2% of services did not collect ethnicity data. Qualitative findings demonstrated the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on minoritised ethnic communities, including disruption to care/mourning practices, and the need for culturally appropriate support. During the pandemic outreach activities were sometimes deprioritised; however, increased collaboration was also reported. Online provision improved access but excluded some. Positive interventions to increase equity included collecting client demographic data; improving outreach, language accessibility and staff representation; supporting other professionals to provide bereavement support; local collaboration and co-production. Conclusions: Service providers report inequities in access to bereavement support. Attention needs to be paid to identifying, assessing and meeting unmet needs for appropriate bereavement support. Identified positive interventions can inform service provision and research.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Marie Curie core grant

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3