Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries

Author:

Brereton Louise1,Ingleton Christine2,Gardiner Clare2,Goyder Elizabeth1,Mozygemba Kati3,Lysdahl Kristin Bakke4,Tummers Marcia5,Sacchini Dario6,Leppert Wojciech7,Blaževičienė Aurelija8,van der Wilt Gert Jan5,Refolo Pietro6,De Nicola Martina6,Chilcott James1,Oortwijn Wija9

Affiliation:

1. ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

3. Department of Health Services Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

4. Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

5. Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

6. Institute of Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

7. Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

8. Department of Nursing and Care, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

9. Health Unit, ECORYS Nederland B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to evaluate models of palliative care service delivery. Aims: To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project development. Design: Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted as ‘advisors’ to aid researchers’ decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries. Setting/participants: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 ‘lay’ people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-to-face or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups. Results: Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23 issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and specific assessments within the health technology assessment. Conclusion: Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need further development.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. User and carer participation in research in palliative care

2. Involving stakeholders and developing a policy for stakeholder involvement in the European network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA

3. Health Technology Assessment international What is HTA? http://www.htai.org/htai/what-is-hta.html (2016, accessed 25 May 2015).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3