An Investigation of General Practitioner Referrals to Palliative Care Services

Author:

Pugh Elizabeth MG1

Affiliation:

1. Intercalated degree medical student, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton

Abstract

A cross-sectional interview study designed to elicit general practitioners' reasons for referral to palliative care services was conducted. Three groups of general practitioners (GPs) were sampled: frequent referrers, non-referrers and nurse referrers. Fifteen GPs from each group were interviewed. A structured interview was carried out either face-to-face or over the telephone. The results showed significant differences between groups of GPs relating to why they did and did not refer patients to palliative care services. The main difference was that the GPs who frequently referred did so most often for ‘nursing support’, while those in the non-referring group most commonly mentioned ‘symptom control’. Fifty-three per cent of both frequent and non-referring GPs gave ‘the carers coping well’ as the commonest reason for not referring patients. Significant differences were also shown in what the GPs perceived was the most important thing they could offer cancer patients, with 60% of the GPs who had referred no patients answering ‘my time’. The results also provided evidence that the majority of the GPs characterised a ‘good death’ as being ‘pain free’, and that they perceived themselves to have an important role in providing palliative care for their terminally ill patients

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3