Barriers and facilitators for parents in end-of-life decision-making for neonates at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study

Author:

Piette Veerle12ORCID,Dombrecht Laure12ORCID,Deliens Luc12,Cools Filip3,Chambaere Kenneth12,Goossens Linde4,Naulaers Gunnar5,Laroche Sabine6,Cornette Luc7,Bekaert Eline8,Decoster Pauline9,Beernaert Kim12,Cohen Joachim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

3. Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

4. Department of Neonatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

5. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven

6. Department of Neonatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

7. Department of Neonatology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Brugge, Belgium

8. Research Department Belgian Poison Centre, Brussels, Belgium

9. Department of Maternity, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Oostende, Belgium

Abstract

Background: Mortality and end-of-life decision-making can occur in newborns, especially within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. For parents, participating in end-of-life decision-making is taxing. Knowledge is lacking on what support is helpful to parents during decision-making. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators experienced by parents in making an end-of-life decision for their infant. Design: Qualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: We interviewed 23 parents with a child that died after an end-of-life decision at a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between April and September 2018. Results: Parents stated barriers and facilitators within 4 themes: 1. Clinical knowledge and prognosis; 2. Quality of information provision; 3. Emotion regulation; and 4. Psychosocial environment. Facilitators include knowing whether the prognosis includes long-term negative quality of life, knowing all treatment options, receiving information according to health literacy level, being able to process intense emotions, having experienced counseling and practical help. Barriers include a lack of general medical knowledge, being unprepared for a poor prognosis, having an uninformed psychologist. Conclusions: We found that clinical information and psychosocial support aid parents in decision-making. Information is best tailored to health literacy. Psychosocial support can be provided by experienced, informed counselors, social services and sibling support, distinguishing between verbal and non-verbal coping preferences, and calm, familiar architecture. Intense emotions may hinder absorption of clinical information, therefore interventions to aid emotion regulation and reduce cognitive load may be looked at in further research. Adjustment of the Situations, Opinions and Options, Parents, Information, Emotions framework based on our results can be evaluated.

Funder

fonds wetenschappelijk onderzoek

bijzonder onderzoeksfonds ugent

universiteit gent

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3