Who accessed STI testing in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic and how: Findings from Natsal-COVID, a cross-sectional quasi-representative survey

Author:

Marquez Nuria Gallego1ORCID,Howarth Alison R.1,Dema Emily1,Burns Fiona12,Copas Andrew J.1,Mercer Catherine H.1,Sonnenberg Pam1,Mitchell Kirstin R.3,Field Nigel1,Gibbs Jo1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

2. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

3. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, online sexual health service delivery increased across Britain. We investigated inequalities in STI testing access and methods of access during the first year of the pandemic. Methods Natsal-COVID, an online-survey of people 18–59 years in Britain, explored sexual health experiences in the first year of the pandemic. We describe the socio-demographics of participants who used STI testing services and compare those who reported being “online service users”, defined as using services with no direct clinician interactions (regardless of whether they also used other methods), with those who were exclusively “other service users”, defined as face-to-face, telephone, or video calls. Results 246/6,064 participants (4.2%) reported STI testing between 03/2020–03/2021. Of those, 35.8% (95%CI 29.2–42.8) used online services. Online service users (compared to other service users) were more often white (74.9% (62.2–84.4) versus 68.5% (59.4–76.3)), less often had anxiety (39.0% (28.4–50.9) versus 57.2% (48.4–65.6)) and less often had disabilities (25.8% (16.8–37.4) versus 48.1% (39.4–56.9)). Among women (only), online users were more often in good health (91.4% (81.3–96.2) versus 69.3% (57.4–79.2)). Conclusions More than one third of STI testers used online services during this period. Differences exist in the characteristics of people accessing online versus other testing services. These data suggest that online services were more likely to be accessed by groups with typically lower risk of poor sexual health (white and in good health). Further investigation is needed, especially if online services are the only option offered, as differences in ability to access services could widen inequalities.

Funder

UCL Coronavirus Response Fund

Wellcome Trust

Economic and Social Research Council

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit; Core Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3