Affiliation:
1. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
2. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
3. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Abstract
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, online sexual health service delivery increased across Britain. We investigated inequalities in STI testing access and methods of access during the first year of the pandemic. Methods Natsal-COVID, an online-survey of people 18–59 years in Britain, explored sexual health experiences in the first year of the pandemic. We describe the socio-demographics of participants who used STI testing services and compare those who reported being “online service users”, defined as using services with no direct clinician interactions (regardless of whether they also used other methods), with those who were exclusively “other service users”, defined as face-to-face, telephone, or video calls. Results 246/6,064 participants (4.2%) reported STI testing between 03/2020–03/2021. Of those, 35.8% (95%CI 29.2–42.8) used online services. Online service users (compared to other service users) were more often white (74.9% (62.2–84.4) versus 68.5% (59.4–76.3)), less often had anxiety (39.0% (28.4–50.9) versus 57.2% (48.4–65.6)) and less often had disabilities (25.8% (16.8–37.4) versus 48.1% (39.4–56.9)). Among women (only), online users were more often in good health (91.4% (81.3–96.2) versus 69.3% (57.4–79.2)). Conclusions More than one third of STI testers used online services during this period. Differences exist in the characteristics of people accessing online versus other testing services. These data suggest that online services were more likely to be accessed by groups with typically lower risk of poor sexual health (white and in good health). Further investigation is needed, especially if online services are the only option offered, as differences in ability to access services could widen inequalities.
Funder
UCL Coronavirus Response Fund
Wellcome Trust
Economic and Social Research Council
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit; Core Funding
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research Programme