Validation of the combined Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale among people with HIV in Vietnam

Author:

Nguyen Minh X1ORCID,Zimmer Catherine2,Latkin Carl A3,Lancaster Kathryn E4ORCID,Dowdy David W5,Hutton Heidi6,Chander Geetanjali7,Frangakis Constantine8,Gaynes Bradley N9,Sripaipan Teerada1,Tran Ha V1,Go Vivian F1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam

2. Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

3. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

4. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

5. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

8. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

9. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

Background Our study aims to examine the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the combined scale Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) among people with HIV (PWH) in Vietnam. Methods Baseline data from an alcohol-reduction intervention trial among ART clients in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam were used for this analysis ( n = 1547). A score ≥10 on the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and PHQ-ADS scale was considered having clinically meaningful depression, anxiety and distress symptoms. Factor structure of the combined PHQ-ADS scale was validated using confirmatory factor analysis, and three models were tested: a one-factor, a two-factor, and a bi-factor model. Reliability and construct validity were examined. Results The prevalence of clinically meaningful depression and anxiety symptoms was 7% and 2%, respectively, while 19% had distress symptoms. A bi-factor model had the best fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.048; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.98). The Omega index of the bi-factor model was 0.97. The scale showed good construct validity through negative associations between depression, anxiety, distress symptoms and quality of life. Conclusions Our study supports the use of a combined scale to measure general distress for PWH, which has good validity, reliability and is unidimensional enough to justify the use of a composite depression and anxiety score.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Dermatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3