Affiliation:
1. Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Level 1, Lauriston Building, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK
Abstract
The objective of the study was to review the indications for scrotal ultrasound scans and to assess the impact on patient management. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis. Case notes of all males referred for a scrotal ultrasound between April 1998 and March 2001 were studied. Data were extracted for the following: age, presenting complaints, physical findings on examination, results of a full sexual screen, treatment, ultrasound result and the designation of the person requesting the scan. All data were tabulated and summated using ‘Windows Excel’ software. One hundred and fifteen men were referred for an ultrasound in this period of time. None had an ultrasound more than once. Of these, 25 subjects could not be included as they either failed to attend for their scan ( n = 8) or their notes could not be traced ( n = 17). Twelve subjects were excluded as they did not fit the selection criteria ( n = 12). Median age was 30 years (Range 19–61 years). The commonest reason for referral was testicular pain ( n = 43) followed by testicular lump ( n = 19). The commonest abnormality on examination was an inflamed epididymis ( n = 18). Forty-two of the ultrasound scans were normal. A testicular mass was detected in only five of the 78 patients (6.4%), of which one was a malignancy (1.2%). A direct referral to a urologist for further management was made in only nine patients. Scrotal ultrasound for pain has limited impact on patient management apart from reassuring a worried patient. However, it remains an important investigation in the management of a suspected testicular lump.
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Dermatology
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献